WMT vs COST Analysis
Both WMT and COST operate in the Consumer Defensive sector within the Discount Stores industry, making them direct competitors.
WMT has a 2.3x larger market capitalization than COST.
WMT trades at a lower P/E ratio (45.2x) compared to COST (52.6x), suggesting WMT may be more attractively valued relative to its earnings.
WMT offers a higher dividend yield (0.80%) vs COST (0.53%), making it more attractive for income investors.
Looking at profitability, WMT has a profit margin of 307.0% while COST's is 296.1%. WMT converts more of its revenue into profit.
In terms of growth, WMT has revenue growth of 5.6% versus 8.3% for COST. COST is growing its top line faster.